#Blue pill or red pill how to

What would it mean for humans to live in a world where a large percentage of stories, melodies, images, laws, policies and tools are shaped by nonhuman intelligence, which knows how to exploit with superhuman efficiency the weaknesses, biases and addictions of the human mind - while knowing how to form intimate relationships with human beings? In games like chess, no human can hope to beat a computer. is seizing the master key to civilization, from bank vaults to holy sepulchers. A.I.’s new mastery of language means it can now hack and manipulate the operating system of civilization. From language emerges myth and law, gods and money, art and science, friendships and nations and computer code. Language is the operating system of human culture. But most of the key skills boil down to one thing: the ability to manipulate and generate language, whether with words, sounds or images. It is difficult for our human minds to grasp the new capabilities of GPT-4 and similar tools, and it is even harder to grasp the exponential speed at which these tools are developing more advanced and powerful capabilities. has haunted humanity since the mid-20th century, yet until recently it has remained a distant prospect, something that belongs in sci-fi more than in serious scientific and political debates.

We should move at whatever speed enables us to get this right. A race to dominate the market should not set the speed of deploying humanity’s most consequential technology. systems with the power of GPT-4 and beyond should not be entangled with the lives of billions of people at a pace faster than cultures can safely absorb them. Biotech labs cannot release new viruses into the public sphere in order to impress shareholders with their wizardry. Technology companies building today’s large language models are caught in a race to put all of humanity on that plane.ĭrug companies cannot sell people new medicines without first subjecting their products to rigorous safety checks. Half of those surveyed stated that there was a 10 percent or greater chance of human extinction (or similarly permanent and severe disempowerment) from future A.I. In 2022, over 700 top academics and researchers behind the leading artificial intelligence companies were asked in a survey about future A.I. Imagine that as you are boarding an airplane, half the engineers who built it tell you there is a 10 percent chance the plane will crash, killing you and everyone else on it.